From 698ec389e00d6f71a5c46839b81d286dec9810eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: BaaRai <130491490+BaaRai@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2026 19:02:13 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Bot: back to deepseek-chat

deepseek-flash dropped the LABELS instruction twice in live tests
(decorated once, absent once); deepseek-chat followed it exactly on
the first try. The price difference is fractions of a cent per call,
reliability wins. The tolerant parser from #20 stays: it is harmless
and protects against any model formatting quirks.
---
 .github/scripts/bot.sh | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/.github/scripts/bot.sh b/.github/scripts/bot.sh
index 6859757..d194a1e 100644
--- a/.github/scripts/bot.sh
+++ b/.github/scripts/bot.sh
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ ask_model() { # $1 = system prompt, $2 = user payload; prints the answer
   local body="${2:0:$MAX_CHARS}"
   local req
   req=$(jq -n --arg sys "$1" --arg body "$body" \
-    '{model: "deepseek-flash",
+    '{model: "deepseek-chat",
       messages: [{role: "system", content: $sys}, {role: "user", content: $body}],
       max_tokens: 900, temperature: 0.2}')
   curl -sS --max-time 120 https://api.deepseek.com/chat/completions \