14 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
BaaRai 1f297d75f2 guard: bound the length of block reasons sent to the model
A deny reason comes from a rule message, the fallback judge or the
target gate, and nothing bounds its length. systemBlockMessage and
TargetBlockMessage now cap the reason at 4000 runes (rune-safe, with a
" …(truncated)" marker) and keep the platform framing and the guidance
text intact. Interceptor.Log still stores the raw reason.
2026-11-11 23:33:53 +01:00
BaaRai 4bcb6d7250 Add agentic guards for goals, hint origin and planner Bash (F5, F6, F11)
Audit findings F5, F6 and F11 for issue #124.

F5, goal guards:
- goal_met refuses while any goal node of the task is open, and when the
  goals cannot be read. A task without goal nodes keeps the old behavior.
- prove_goal accepts a fact as evidence only when its confidence is
  "observed"; otherwise it refuses and the goal stays open. Findings are
  still accepted.

F6, hint origin:
- add_hint stores the calling ToolSet's worker as the hint origin instead
  of "human", and passes it to the planner trigger (TriggerEvent.HintOrigin).
- renderTriggers names the writer: the human via the main agent, a
  cross-task orchestration, or an agent, with a neutral fallback.

F11, built-in rules for the planner and the main agent:
- Interceptor.MatchBuiltin evaluates the enabled "[built-in]" deny rules on
  the intercept-enabled tools.
- The target-only guard applies them before the target gate, whether the
  gate is on or off. User rules and the judge stay out of it.
- SetRulesForTest is a test seam for the store-less guard tests; Log is a
  no-op without a store.
2026-11-11 22:39:13 +01:00
BaaRai ca15063db7 fix(intercept): match block rules on the declared targets before any lookup
The target gate resolved each name through the cache before it matched the
asset block rules, so a call to a name that a name rule blocks still cost a
DNS lookup, and that query reached the name servers of the blocked domain.
URL rules (exact_url, fuzzy_url) were not evaluated at dispatch at all: the
gate passed no URL to the matcher, so they only applied to asset and intent
writes.

targetCheck.run now decides in this order, for a gated call:

1. URL rules, once per decision, on the URLs the call declares, as written.
2. Every block rule on the declared form of every target: the name as
   written, the IP literal, the range.
3. Only then resolution (names a derived exemption covers are still never
   resolved), and the block rules again on the resolved addresses.
4. Exemptions, pins and requests, unchanged.

A hit in 1 or 2 blocks with TARGET_RULE_BLOCKED and the same decided row as
any block, costs no lookup for any target of the call, and opens no request.

- intercept.extractDeclared returns the targets (ExtractTargets is now a thin
  wrapper, unchanged for its callers) and the URLs that name a target: the
  WebFetch url, and every URL token the command-string rules read in Bash,
  shell_open, Monitor, shell_send and the string leaves of other tools,
  including ExecuteExtraTool's inner call.
- The custom http tool's rendered URL and the URLs of a rendered command go to
  the same URL rules (gateRendered takes the URLs).
- Known limit, stated in the comments next to the matcher (db.matchOne) and
  at the dispatch match: URL rules match the declared string. exact_url misses
  any other spelling (case, percent-encoding, trailing slash, added query,
  /./), fuzzy_url misses an encoded substring, and a command can build its URL
  at run time. For a host, a domain, IP or CIDR rule is the one to write.

Unchanged: a tool-rule or judge deny still blocks before the gate is reached
(no extraction, no lookup, no request); asset block rules still win over an
allow and an ask; the gate off path does nothing; scripts stay advisory.

Tests:
- intercept: TestBlockRuleOnDeclaredNameNeedsNoLookup (exact_domain and
  fuzzy_domain; zero lookups, also for an unblocked name earlier in the same
  call), TestExtractDeclaredURLs, TestURLBlockRuleAtDispatch (WebFetch, Bash,
  MCP, ExecuteExtraTool, a pinned and an exempt host, a disabled rule, the
  rendered URL and command; zero lookups), TestExactURLRuleMatchesOnlyAsWritten
  (documents the limit).
- guard: TestBlockRuleWinsOverAllowAndAsk (name rule and URL rule, each over a
  rule allow, judge allow, rule ask and judge ask, real interceptor: blocked,
  no allow row, nobody asked, zero lookups). TestDenyRuleWinsBeforeTargetRequest
  now also covers a judge deny and asserts zero lookups with the real gate.
- server: TestBypass_CustomScriptToolTargetNotGated documents that a script
  tool's target, written in its stored code, is not visible to the gate: in a
  gated task the call is allowed and reaches the target with no lookup, no
  request and no row.
2026-11-11 15:47:58 +01:00
BaaRai c0b741bcf6 feat(intercept): gate the rendered targets of custom tools (S3b 1.8)
The hook reads the parameters of a custom tool call, not the URL or the
command they render, and not a target written in the template itself. The
custom command and http tools now run the target gate inside the tool, on what
they are about to run, before anything is sent or started. Gate off (the
default) is unchanged: with no scope or the flag off nothing is parsed,
resolved, read or written.

- intercept.GateRenderedURL: the target is read as net/http dials it (host of
  the parsed URL, explicit port, else the scheme default), then goes through
  the same decision as at the hook (asset block rules, exemptions, resolution,
  pin lookup) and the same request-and-wait, at most three passes. A URL whose
  target cannot be read is blocked with TARGET_GATE_UNAVAILABLE and logged as
  a decided row; no request, no lookup.
- intercept.GateRenderedCommand: the rendered command is read with the
  command-string rules of Bash, and so is the rendering without the shell
  quoting of the parameters (a quoted parameter inside a host name hides the
  name from the rules). A command that names no target passes, as in Bash.
- A gated scope without the interceptor that owns the gate blocks
  (TARGET_GATE_UNAVAILABLE), it never lets the call through.
- runCommandTool and runHTTPTool take the tool key, which names the request
  rows. The gate runs before the tool's own timeout starts.
- guard.TargetBlockMessage (was targetBlockMessage) is exported so the tools
  return the same model-facing text as the hook.
- Unchanged: the script tool (its target is in stored code; advisory, D9), the
  custom-tool test endpoint (no scope: the operator's own action, D14), the
  hook order (a rule or judge deny blocks first; the tool then never runs, so
  its rendered target is never read), the evaluation of asset rules.

Tests: TestRendered* in intercept (no database); in server, against
PostgreSQL: TestCustomHTTPRenderedTargetGated,
TestCustomCommandRenderedTargetGated, TestCustomToolTestEndpointUngated,
TestTargetGateEndToEnd (a scripted worker's WebFetch waits, a click pins, the
next call passes, revoke, it asks again), TestDenyRuleWinsBeforeRenderedTarget
and TestGateOffTaskIsUnchanged.

Not in this change: redirect targets of WebFetch and of the custom http tool
(1.9).
2026-11-11 15:04:42 +01:00
BaaRai 78f92f44fc feat(intercept): target extraction, resolver, exemptions and the gate in the hook (S3b 1.5-1.7)
The approval gate for asset targets now decides. It is opt-in per task and
per conversation (target_gate, default off). With the flag off nothing is
extracted, resolved, read or written, and every branch of the hook behaves as
before. No UI.

Extraction and normalisation (1.5)
- intercept.NormalizeTarget: lower case, trailing dot, userinfo, IPv6
  brackets, IPv4-mapped IPv6, decimal / hex / octal / short IPv4, percent-
  encoded host, punycode; port explicit, else the scheme default, else 0.
- intercept.ExtractTargets: WebFetch url exactly; Bash, shell_open, Monitor
  (command) and shell_send (text) with the command-string rules (URL with a
  scheme, IP, IP:port, host:port, CIDR; a bare name is not a target); every
  string of the input for MCP tools, custom tools and any tool the gate does
  not know. ExecuteExtraTool is unwrapped to the inner tool. The platform's
  domain tools, the file tools and web_search have no target.
- The fields are decoded as the tools decode them (key case, last duplicate),
  and a URL authority that reads differently quoted and unquoted yields both
  readings.

Resolver, exemptions, gate decision (1.6)
- Resolver interface, system implementation (A and AAAA), 3 s per lookup,
  positive answers cached 10 s per host with collapsed lookups, failures and
  empty answers never cached, always fresh when a request is raised.
- Exemptions are exact host + port. Derived from the configuration (LLM
  gateways, search backend in use, platform proxies): computed on every call,
  never resolved, never voided. Stored (settings key
  target_gate_exempt_hosts, seeded once with the package sources): resolved,
  and void when any address is private, loopback, link-local, unspecified,
  unique-local, multicast or a metadata address. An entry in both origins
  counts as derived. A stored IP literal that can never be exempt does not
  apply.
- GET / PUT /api/target-gate/exemptions and GET .../history. A change is
  validated (ValidateExemptionHost on the normalised host) and appended to
  target_gate_exemption_log in the transaction that stores it.
- Interceptor.CheckTargets: asset block rules (global and of the task) on the
  name and its addresses, exemptions, resolution, pin lookup. A (host, 0) pin
  covers every port; a (host, 443) pin covers 443 only and never a target
  without a declared port; two pins are never merged. At most 5 unpinned
  targets per call. Codes: TARGET_RULE_BLOCKED, TARGET_RESOLVE_FAILED,
  TARGET_TOO_MANY, TARGET_GATE_UNAVAILABLE; none opens a request.
- With the upstream egress proxy set every pin is name-only at call time,
  whatever name_only_effective says in its row.
- An approval never pins zero addresses: the pin writer refuses a request
  that displays none (db.ErrTargetPinEmpty, 422 on the decide endpoint, the
  row stays pending) and RequestTargets does not open one.
- Every block, and the first use per process of each exemption and of each
  pin version, is a decided row (decided_by system, decision_source target).

The gate in the hook (1.7)
- guard.applyIntercept: a deny by a rule or by the judge blocks first, before
  any target request exists; then CheckTargets; an allow is logged as before
  and does not satisfy the gate; an ask and an unpinned target share one
  request, and the classic ask is raised only when it was not merged. The
  call is checked again after the decisions, at most three passes.
- The gate applies to every tool of a gated session, enabled for rules or
  not, and to the target-only guard of the planner and the main agent, which
  still records blocks only.
- Target blocks have their own model-facing text, built from the code and the
  reason of the result.

Not in this change: rendered targets of custom tools (1.8) and redirect
targets (1.9). Subprocess paths stay advisory; the TestBypass_* tests document
what the gate does not see.
2026-11-11 00:34:55 +01:00
BaaRai 135b083b9a feat(guard): planner and main-agent hooks, target-gate scope in every session (S3b 1.1)
Step 1.1 of the S3b phase 1 plan. Wiring only: the approval gate for asset
targets is not enforced yet and no behaviour changes.

- Planner.Plan and MainAgent.Chat take a hooks parameter, like Worker.Execute.
  Their sessions had no hooks, so nothing saw their tool calls before execution.
- guard.NewTargetOnly: the guard for those two agent kinds. It runs the
  target-gate seam only: no intercept rule, no fallback judge, and no entry in
  the audit ring (Guard.record is untouched and not called for these calls).
- Task.TargetGuard, built beside Task.Guard.
- intercept.WithTargetScope / TargetScopeFromContext: task id or conversation
  id, an Enabled func and a wait bound, set at the five session entry points
  (planner round, final planner round with wait bound 0, main-agent turn,
  worker intent, conversation turn).

The seam allows every call and reads and writes nothing. No task or
conversation has an opt-in flag yet, so Enabled is nil (off) everywhere.
2026-11-10 22:14:24 +01:00
BaaRai e233c02314 Translate all Chinese text to English
Comments, doc comments, UI labels, log and error messages, LLM prompt
strings, markdown docs, test data and assertions. Identifiers, enum
keys, routes, placeholders and code structure are unchanged.

Notes:
- docs/漏洞流量证据.md renamed to docs/vulnerability-traffic-evidence.md
- tests that exercised CJK specific handling (GBK zip names, Chinese
  full text search) now use ASCII equivalents; go build passes and the
  test suite matches the pre translation baseline (remaining failures
  need a PostgreSQL DSN and fail identically on the original)
- frontend mention syntax now uses English kinds (finding, asset, ...)
  matching the backend, chat mentions tests pass
2026-10-08 23:14:34 +02:00
RuoJi6 d9628d7cc0 feat(intercept): 模型审查补充任务上下文与裁决说明 (#124)
审查模型改为接收版本化 JSON:任务描述/目标/操作约束、工作目录、Worker 意图、当前轮输入,以及按 tool_use_id 配对的近期工具执行记录;末尾是完整的 tool_name 与 arguments。

- 任务约束每次审查从数据库重新读取;读取失败或约束超预算转人工。
- 历史只保留唯一配对的执行事实,排除 Agent 自述、未完成请求与平台拒绝反馈。
- 裁决改为 JSON decision(allow/ask/deny) + comment,三种结果均须说明实际操作、成功后果与命中规则。
- 所有模型裁决(含自动放行)保存实际模型输入与 SHA-256 指纹,详情页可展开。
- 对话审批卡片支持展开完整请求、模型输入、裁决与执行结果。
- 修复父目录 lockfile 导致的 Turbopack 根目录误判。

官方默认拦截规则、工具范围与优先级不变。
2026-09-15 20:08:12 +08:00
Autumn-27 b2b6821d32 fix(guard): 拦截文案标明为平台管控而非目标防御
拦截 deny/ask 回给 agent 的 tool_result 原文案(禁止执行/用户拒绝)
读起来与目标侧 WAF/403 无异,渗透 agent 会当成目标防御去改写命令、
换 payload 尝试绕过。统一经 systemBlockMessage 加平台权威框架,说明
此为平台管控、操作被禁止,引导换方向而非规避。
2026-09-10 11:30:28 -04:00
ji ruo 009799e160 feat(intercept): 增加审批记录详情与执行审计 2026-09-10 15:10:50 +08:00
Autumn-27 e1da84fe44 feat(intercept): 未命中规则的命令接入 LLM 兜底审批
在正则/字符串规则之外新增一套独立的模型兜底层:规则命中直接按规则走;
一条规则都没命中时,才由模型做语义判定(ALLOW/ASK/DENY),人工审批兜底。

- intercept: DefaultJudgePrompt(三态判定提示词)+ ParseVerdict;Reviewer 回调注入;
  Judge() 读全局 llm_judge_* 配置、超时/失败回退、ask 填审批超时、模型判定加 [模型] 前缀
- guard: applyIntercept 未命中分支调 Judge;模型 allow 不落库,deny/ask 带 reason 入库
- db: intercept_pending 加 reason 列(带 ALTER IF NOT EXISTS 补旧库);
  create 函数支持 reason 与 ruleID 0→NULL;历史查询带出 reason
- server: 用 providerForProfile + 单次 Stream 收集注入裁判;GET/PUT /api/intercept/judge
- web: 拦截页拆「拦截规则 / 模型配置」两 tab;拦截范围提为共用信息条;
  模型配置双栏布局(提示词直接展开编辑);审批/任务拦截页标注「模型判定」+ 理由

配置默认值:失败回退 allow、审批超时动作 deny、模型 allow 不落库、
提示词默认即内置模板(清空回退模板)。无需 DB 结构性迁移(judge 走 settings KV)。

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019QXSCDmzimwnjntBNCgUD7
2026-08-23 10:02:43 -04:00
Autumn-27 fc6885ea75 feat: 拦截规则 allow/deny 命中也进审批记录(三种 action 全可观测)
此前只有 ask 命中会写 intercept_pending(审批记录);deny 直接拦下、allow 直接放行,
历史里查不到。现让三种 action 命中都留痕,便于观测:

- db: CreateDecidedIntercept —— 一条 insert 直接以最终状态(allowed/denied)落库并盖
  decided_at(复用 intercept_pending 现有合法状态,无需 schema 迁移)。
- intercept: Interceptor.Log —— 非阻塞、best-effort 记录一次规则命中(DB 出错不影响
  工具调用结果)。
- guard: deny 分支记 denied、显式 allow 规则命中记 allowed;无规则命中的放行不记,
  避免全量刷屏。

前端零改动:审批记录/历史页(interceptHistory=全状态、interceptTask=全状态)本就渲染
allowed/denied/pending;pending 过滤仅用于审批按钮区。
2026-08-17 10:03:56 -04:00
Autumn-27 46b7cdbeed feat: spawn_task 补 seed_first_intent + 破坏性/外泄 gating 移入可删除的 DB 拦截规则
- spawn_task 新增 seed_first_intent 参数(默认 false),与 HTTP createTask 对齐;
  简单任务可开启直接下发一条种子意图开跑测试
- guard.go 删除写死的 reDestructive/reExfil gating,preToolUse 仅记审计后走拦截规则
- db 新增 seedDefaultInterceptRulesV2:破坏性系统命令(默认开)/数据外泄管道(默认关)
  以普通[内置]规则 seed,可禁用可删除;独立 v2 迁移标志兼容老库
2026-08-15 05:30:47 -04:00
Autumn-27andClaude Opus 4.8 0ef8561411 chore: ARTEX 初始化
ARTEX — AI 自主渗透测试系统(Go 后端 + Next.js 前端,单二进制内嵌)。

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-26 04:27:45 -04:00